Home » Authors » Mark Armstrong » Constitutional Crisis

Constitutional Crisis

By Mark Armstrong

 

What happens when those authorized and commissioned to prosecute Federal crimes are the criminals? When some uncompromised members of Congressional committees begin to unravel their sedition: their defrauding of a secret FISA court with bought and paid for disinformation; when top law enforcement personnel are caught in constant communication as to how desperate they are to bring down a duly elected president; when the ultimate enforcers of Law are themselves deeply involved in a conspiracy to break it… What do you call that? A Constitutional Crisis, that’s what!

Congress has the power to gather evidence, compel testimony and may well succeed in proving a criminal conspiracy among top officials at the FBI and the Department of Justice. But then what? The ordinary process would be to make a criminal referral to one of these agencies for prosecution. But the bosses at the agencies are not about to prosecute themselves, or their closest colleagues.

Couldn’t the President fire the crooks and replace them with other prosecutors not implicated in the shenanigans? That’s precisely what the mainstream media has been salivating about for weeks and months! “The President surely WANTS to fire Mueller. He surely WANTS to fire Rosenstein, and that would be just like the Saturday Night Massacre of Watergate fame. That would mean the dreaded “Constitutional Crisis” of their dreams. “It’s not the crime that brings a president down, it’s the cover-up!” They say that by the thousands of repetitions in the mainstream “news” media with no shame at all. 

The problem is that the mainstream “news” media has been an active participant in the conspiracy. They’ve been hyperventilating over leaks from “highly placed government officials” all day and night for over a year. We weren’t told who the “information” came from, but the sodomites and the anchor desks certainly knew. 

How convenient that a brand new shoe would drop every night for over a year, 20 minutes before the newscast was to begin, each one designed to cast guilt of “Russian Collusion” on the Trump campaign and subsequent presidency. We’ll see it proven shortly, that the conspirators themselves, those in the topmost positions in the FBI and DOJ were the source of the information coming from “highly placed government officials.” Some of it has already been proven, in their own words, from their own internal communications.

It’s really something when the audience KNOWS what the story is while the presenters carry on whistling past the graveyard, making up one scandal, one crisis after another while ignoring the 800 pound gorilla in the studio. But they sneer, squint intently, pout and flirt while rolling their eyes and laughing derisively at every weak, outnumbered “Trump defender” on the set. 

But now there are indictments. And it’s really BIG. It proves “The Russians” were messing around in the U. S. before, during and after the election of 2016! It’s a huge deal that justifies over a year of breathless impeachment talk. Hour after hour of raised voices and disgusted scowls vindicated at last! The Russians really DID work to undermine our democracy. Thirteen indictments against people half a world away PROVE that “the Russians meddled!” They disguised their identities on the internet, used fake Twitter and Facebook accounts. Wow! What’ll they think of next? Why, nobody pretends to be somebody else on the Internet! Let alone “The Russians,” who’ve been expert at disseminating disinformation forever.

Never mind that a Facebook ad executive has said this “huge development” is nonsense. Most of the ads, pro-Muslim, anti-Muslim, pro-Hillary, pro-Bernie, pro-Jill Stein, anti-Hillary, pro-Trump, anti-Trump, were spent AFTER the election, some after the inauguration. To say that there was a PRO-TRUMP, anti-Hillary theme to all of this is just plain mistaken, which you’ll discover with a minimum of trying. 

So what about the year and a half of false reporting? What about the knowing expressions, the endless speculation of an election stolen by fraud? What about the talk of treason, resulting in an unhinged lunatic fraudulently gaining the White House? 

“Trump’s just a liar.” “He’s like a petulant child.” “He’s clinically insane.” “He’s a bully.” “He’s a dictator.” “He’s a sucker for beautiful women.” say the eye-rolling homosexuals who bring you “The Most Trusted Name in News.” “He’s the commander in chief for the rape culture.” “He’s a menace, about to touch off World War III from his Twitter account.” 

Round and round it goes, where or when it stops nobody knows. The Law enforcement officials in this case are the crooks, (with the possible exception of the recused Jeff Sessions) aided and abetted by the queer communist arbiters of information, and they’re not about to send themselves up the river. This is where the irresistible force meets the impenetrable object. 

It’s a Constitutional Crisis alright, just not the one the media has been cheer-leading. Justice is fallen in the streets once and for all, and there’s no clear method of retrieving it.